With all this idiotic talk and politically correct rhetoric going on about Osama bin Laden’s death, all I have to say is thank God for Saturday Night Live.
Here’s the SNL skit, spoofing bin Laden’s last will and testament.
I don’t care who you are, that’s funny right there.
Is it politically correct? Of course not. That’s what makes it funny.
What’s more, this blog is blatantly anti-political correctness. You would know that if you’ve read my other posts.
Go ahead. I’ll wait.
*Hums the Star Spangled Banner*
This SNL video absolutely had to be done, in order to restore the sanity of the American public after bin Laden’s death. I don’t think I could have taken one more ‘was bin Laden’s killing legal‘ or ‘is it right to show Osama’s death pictures‘ article. Islamic militants have even made the news, claiming the United States didn’t give Osama bin Laden a proper Muslim burial.
Maybe the world (more specifically the media) has some crazy notion that pre-9/11, things at the bin Laden hideout went something like this:
bin Laden: Ok boys, we’re gonna do this by the book. Now Anjem, you need to make sure you’re not uttering any racial slurs during the attack. Screaming that you love Allah is ok, but try not to make anybody feel bad. Also, let them know how sorry you are for doing this, and that you know how much their families will miss them.
Anjem: Awww…but Osama. You know how much I like the racial slurs…
bin Laden: Shut up, Anjem. We are not here to make enemies. Jaleel! Listen up! Be sure to say a Christian prayer, Buddhist chant, and a Jewish minha right before the takeover. And do the whole crossing-chest thing they do in their churches, so we don’t get accused of being unfair.
Jaleel: But Osama, I can’t do the crossing thing. Allah will be very angry, and might not give me all my virgins.
bin Laden: Who is running this show, me or you Jaleel? Allah will understand. We must do this in the proper, politically correct fashion. And even though you guys will be dead, rest assured that I will personally call president Bush when this is over, and ask if there is anything that I can do to help. You know, with the cleaning of the rubble or the burying of their people. Praise be to
Allah, unless that offends anybody. Anybody?
Why else would they put those jokers on the air?
Newsflash: The world is afraid of Islam.
It’s more out of fear, than respect or fairness, which is why we’re expected to take the moral high road on this one. Even president Obama, the leader of the most powerful country in the world, made it a point to say that we weren’t at war with Islam during his national address, the day bin Laden was killed. Obama also made it clear that America wasn’t the antagonist.
Why don’t you just come out and say it, Mr. President?
Please don’t hurt us.
Obama phrased his address this way because he is afraid of the repercussions of killing the world’s worst terrorist.
Not that vengeance shouldn’t be taken in to account. But did Obama really need to fall over so overtly in front of the entire country, after commanding our brave soldiers to commit such a noble act just hours earlier?
Take a break already! Our boys (and girls) earned their moment in the sun.
Of course, president Obama’s official reason for taking a dive at the hands of Islam will be that most of the world’s Muslims are moderate. Again, we are not at war with moderate Muslims, and he doesn’t want to offend them. This overplayed rhetoric spills out of liberal politicians any time Muslims are mentioned, and Obama is no exception.
Hey guys, here’s a revelation! It’s the Muslim leadership who are the extremists. And good, moderate followers will do what their leaders tell them.
At least I think that’s how the whole ‘leader-follower’ theory works. Especially within a religion as strict as Islam.
I’m not just picking on Obama. The rest of the first-world leaders seem to feel the exact same way. Just take a look at what is going on across the pond. Sharia law was implemented for civil court cases in London as far back as 2008. I’m sure it’s just a matter of time until criminal law follows suit. That is how Islam is designed–to peacefully get a foothold in the beginning, and then slowly take over the entire community its followers inhabit, using the community’s own sense of fairness and virtue against it.
It is ingenious, really. And evil. A master plan for a master
Seems like something similar happened back in the 1940s. I can’t quite remember how we handled that. Oh, World War II, that’s right…
In the end, the rest of the world’s religions aren’t to blame for the hateful, cruel, unjust ways of Sharia law, Islam, or their golden boy, Osama bin Laden. So why should we pick up the slack? America (or any other country) is not required to bury terrorists according to their faith, nor to handle bin Laden’s corpse with kid gloves, just because other terrorists will be upset if we don’t.
They’re terrorists. They want to kill us and everyone and every thing we love. The last thing we should be thinking about is whether or not we owe them some kind of polite courtesy.
Giving a bully your lunch money, and telling him what a nice guy he is, is a very temporary solution.
History has shown that when Islam conquers another group of people, it doesn’t usually matter whether the conquered group was submissive/remorseful about previous acts or not. As staunch as the Muslim faith is, we unbelievers are condemned to inferiority and dhimmitude simply because we are not Muslims. That is our crime, and as far as Islam is concerned, it is unforgivable.
A couple verses from the “peaceful” Koran should let you know just where you, as an infidel, stand with Muslims (thanks to thereligionofpeace.com for these excerpts):
O ye who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allah is with those who keep their duty.(9:123)
Or how about:
Shall we tell you of those who lose most in respect of their deeds? Those whose efforts have been wasted in this life, while they thought that they were acquiring good by their works? They are those who deny the Signs of their Lord and the fact of their having to meet Him (in the Hereafter): vain will be their works, nor shall We, on the Day of Judgment, give them any weight. That is their reward, Hell, because they rejected Faith, and took My Signs and My Messengers by way of jest. (18:103-106)
As this last passage clearly states, it doesn’t matter whether you think you are accomplishing good deeds or not, if you don’t believe in Allah, you are nothing, and bound for hell. It is painfully obvious that it will do us no good to try to appease Islam, whether or not we believe our prior actions to be wrong. They simply don’t care.
The leaders of the free world and liberal society are attempting in vain to gain the trust and respect of Muslims, when according to their beliefs, as proven above, it just isn’t possible.
We are not going to apologize for making fun of Osama bin Laden. He killed thousands of innocent Americans. It’s literally the least we could do.
Unlike the politicians, most American people are not afraid, simply watchful and concerned. As long as we have our military and Second Amendment rights, the citizens of this great nation will do just fine.
I would like to thank SNL for their damn-near masterpiece. You kids did all right.
What a fine, comical end to such a waste of human skin.
You know who commits a lot of crimes?
Don’t let those modest clothes and pious, friendly attitudes fool you. Underneath it all, the Amish are a seething, rage-filled organized crime syndicate, just waiting to catch one of your kids alone and off guard. Waiting outside their schools to fill their little systems with one of the most horrible substances imaginable. Yes, the Amish are peddling….
Worse than crack cocaine or crystal meth, raw milk, or ‘raw’ as it’s called on the streets, is now the number one substance of abuse among children aged five to twelve. Most of these kids have ‘cool’ parents, who claim that raw is good for their kids, and that as long as they’re drinking it at home, they’re not hurting anyone else. As a matter of fact, most child raw addicts were turned on to the substance by the very people who are supposed to be protecting them–mom and dad.
Raw is such a rampant epidemic that the Feds have taken notice.
Recently, a small Amish farm in Pennsylvania was raided by the FDA and a group of US Marshals for selling raw to willing consumers. Some time in April of 2010, at about 5 AM, these Amish ‘dealers’ were put under the heat lamps and pumped for information, much like the cows they own are pumped for their ‘product’. According to terrified onlookers, this is how it went down:
Feds: “Where’s the juice, Big M?” (a.k.a. Malachai, whose name we changed to protect his family) “We know you’ve been selling it across state lines. That’s a federal crime, beardy boy.”
Big M: “We don’t abideth by your modern laws, G-Man. So shoveth thee off my farm. And taketh Food and Drug man with thee. That raw is for personal use.”
But alas, Malachai was outnumbered, and outsmarted. The Feds eventually found vats of raw, unprocessed milk labeled for sale to different cities around the country. The Feds had found their smoking gun. It was all they needed to gain a conviction.
The charge: Posession with intent to distribute…raw milk.
Malachai was done for. However, this was not to say that he wasn’t given a chance to change his ways. The FDA had even sent him a letter, telling him to cease and desist. But poor Malachai was just too far gone to think about consequences.
Let this be a lesson to you, boys and girls, about the dangers of messing with the federal government. Sure, you’ll have strong teeth and bones. But if you drink raw milk, you pay the price. Just ask Malachai.
I can’t help but wonder how the next “this is your brain” commercials will play out.
Osama bin Laden has been reported dead, and reports say that the United States has the body. I will update with more information as it’s reported.
President Obama is scheduled to speak at 10:30 ET. Whether or not it will be about bin Laden has yet to be revealed.
According to Fox News, Osama bin Laden was killed last week by US missile strikes.
CNN reports that bin Laden was killed by US Navy Seals earlier today, confirmed earlier in president Obama’s address to the nation.
TRANSCRIPT OF PRESIDENT OBAMA’S SPEECH:
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.“
That, in a nutshell folks, is the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. It’s a right that
every United States citizen has, including you. A right that allows a person to defend him/herself using firearms. One I whole-heartedly support.
Not to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but many liberal presidential administrations have tried to regulate the Second Amendment to the point of near non-existence. It’s been a fight between the liberals and conservatives for a long time. The right wing says we need our guns to defend ourselves against intruders and tyrannical government, the left says “guns kill people, get rid of them”.
Though many tactics have been used over the years by each side to try to implement their policies on gun control, there’s one group that has crossed the line. The Obama administration is that group.
The story is a bit convoluted, so I’ll start at the beginning.
As I mentioned in an earlier post, there is a drug war going on in Mexico. The Mexican drug cartels are killing hundreds of innocent people every week in a turf war of drastic proportions. Many of the weapons used in this southern war include military-grade machine guns, grenades and ammunition; though some of these weapons were acquired from countries like Guatemala and Nicaragua, most come from the United States, verified via serial number.
The cartels have grown so powerful that the Mexican government and law enforcement have been rendered powerless. The nefarious cartels have even begun invading the United States, coercing American teens and street gangs to become hitmen and distributors for their enterprises.
I mention the Mexican drug war because it’s the newest reason for arguing in favor of tighter gun control laws here in the States. Supposedly, the cartels have been coming across the US border to buy their guns from small, privately owned gun stores. At least that’s what president Obama told America.
Here’s the quote, via Fox News
“More than 90 percent of the guns recovered in Mexico come from the United States, many from gun shops that line our border,” president Obama said in February 2009.
Now I don’t know about you, but I’ve been in a gun store. I’ve never seen military-grade weapons or grenades for sale. The ATF would have a field day with any privately owned store that attempted to sell such items.
As it turns out, our illustrious president told a bold-faced lie. And thanks to Wikileaks, we now know the truth.
Leaked cables revealed that not only did the Obama administration know where the weapons came from prior to the public statement from the president, but proved that it was our own government who sold them. The Department of Defense and the State Department were the “mom and pop” gun stores who sold military-grade weapons to Mexico.
Weapons that are now in the hands of ruthless killers.
President Obama wasn’t the only individual who was in on the lie. US Attorney General Eric Holder and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton knew the score too.
Of course the Obama administration will argue that they didn’t sell the guns directly to the cartels, but to the Mexican government; the bottom line is they lied to the American people about selling the weapons in the first place. This is an administration that simply cannot be trusted.
The big question is: Why isn’t the Obama administration being held accountable?
Not only for their lies, but for their actions. Our government knowingly sold guns to a government that lacks security and is rife with corruption. Now those guns are being used by criminals to commit unspeakable acts against innocent people. And those acts are rapidly migrating north of the US/Mexico border.
But it’s a crime for United States citizens to sell guns across state lines.
Maybe Obama has loftier goals than just disarming American citizens and depriving us of our Second Amendment rights.
Why else would he provide a means to attack innocent Mexican citizens, let alone his fellow countrymen?
Hey there boys-n-girls, I’ve got a joke for you.
What do you get when you cross a Mexican with an octopus?
“Uh…I dunno. What?”
I don’t know either, but I bet it sure is good at picking lettuce.
So. Are you offended?
Now take a look at this short video.
How about now?
I know the audio isn’t very good, so I’ll explain to you what’s going on here.
That video is a recording of democratic California congresswoman Loretta Sanchez being interviewed on a liberal radio show, talking about her experiences meeting members of the Tea Party. She’s using a southern accent to represent, well, apparently all of them.
Here’s a transcript of what she said:
Sanchez: “Hey, what’s your name?”
Tea Party member: “My name is M-O-E.”
Sanchez: “Ok Moe. Moe-ster. How you doing baby? What are we going to do today? What’s your interest? What can we work on together?”
Tea Party member: “Well, it’s unconstitutional.”
So not only are all Tea Party members southern, but I guess they’re stupid too, because all they can say, according to Sanchez, is that everything is unconstitutional. If I were Sanchez, I’d bet they all have stills in their backyards and bring gallons of that “white lightnin” to every one of their get-togethers.
Out in the sticks, of course. With a few banjos and some corn-cob pipes.
Now are you offended?
Well, according to society, no matter what has been said or done, if you’re a Caucasian, you shouldn’t be.
Let me rephrase that. You’re not allowed to be. You should just take it as a joke.
So let’s turn the tables for a minute.
What if, say, Mitt Romney had told that Mexican joke I mentioned above at a campaign function?
“Oh no he di-int!”
That’s right ladies and gentlemen, it would be ‘Hands Across America’. Every Latino worth his salt would be out the next day, protesting at his state legislature. And it would make national news.
Heck, ol’ Mitt would probably earn himself a visit from the ACLU.
But what about Sanchez? What’s going on with that?
Since I’m guessing that this post is the first you’ve heard of the story, not much.
Hmmm. Seems like I’ve mentioned this type of politically correct behavior before.
This is how political correctness tears society apart. There’s one set of rules for one group, and another set for others. With both sides being at odds all the time, somebody is going to feel neglected and put-upon when all is said and done.
Politically correct behavior is insane. We’re like a bunch of little kids, getting mad at other kids for calling us names. Like we’re five years old or something.
“Mooooom. Jimmy called me a dog-faced booger eater.”
You know what my mom would have said?
“Call him one back.”
I would have, and we would have left it at that.
America, we won’t make it as a nation divided. It’s impossible. So let’s put aside these petty differences and focus on the important things in life. God, family, and country.
For God’s sake, whatever happened to the old “Sticks and Stones” mantra??
If you walk away from this post having learned nothing else, please take this saying to heart:
I wonder who said that?